




URGENT SUPPORT NEEDED - DUBLIN DOG BAN
I have
just read the article in Saturdays Irish Times on Dublin City councils
decision to ban certain breeds of dogs from council properties. This
decision causes me great concern for a number of reasons. How did the
Council reach the decision about dangerous breeds? What criteria were
applied and who advised them on this decision? Did the Council consult with
any of the animal welfare organisations that are now going to have deal with
a huge increase in abandoned and unwanted dogs as a result of this decision?
Were they consulted as to the wisdom or otherwise of such a decision. How
many other options were explored before this decision was reached?
I find it quite upsetting as for one it is irresponsible people that have
led to the ban of these dogs, I work as one of Jan Fennell's dog listeners
where we do our best to educate people as to why (all breeds) of dogs
display certain behaviour. To put certain dogs on a dangerous dog list just
does not make sense, that's like saying all the Irish drink and all the
English are footy hooligans, and all French were berets and all Russians
drink vodka. No two dogs are the same they have their own personalities and
the outcome on the dog view to life depends entirely on how the human
educates the dog for life.
I am glad to say that I have indeed helped clients to manage their
aggressive dogs, none of which are on the dangerous dog list, and I have
dealt with dogs on the list too, It would make far more sense if owners were
to do a dog owning course, after all if you buy a car you cant just go out
on the road and drive you need to pass a test. Surely the council could have
explored the option of ANY dog owner applying for a license for their dog
should have to prove that they have had advice and training for themselves
and their dog. The Council, before reaching their decision, should have
sought the advice of people who deal with animal welfare on a daily basis.
Such organisations are by and large lobbying for responsible legislation
that states that it should be dealt with by ¡deed not breed¢. Any dog can
have the capacity to be aggressive depending on how it has been treated by
human beings. Such legislation would also allow for degrees of offences and
remedies required by the owners as opposed to wholesale destruction of dogs
by virtue of the fact that they have a specific breed name.
Such draconian actions and legislation that supports such actions has proven
in other areas to be a resounding failure. This decision will result in a
number of things:
Distraught families and children who have to hand over beloved family pets
either for re-homing or destruction with no responsible assessment of the
individual dog and its owners.
Irresponsible owners, particularly those who use their dogs for fighting and
who breed dogs for the same purpose will most certainly not hand their dogs
over and will instead put them into hiding and carry on with their cruel
practices even further from the public eye.
Amnesties will be offered by councils to those owners to hand their dogs
over and this will fail also.
Many dogs will now be abandoned or thrown on to the streets for animal
welfare organisations to pick up and take responsibility for. These
organisations are generally under resourced anyway and this will result in
the needless cull of many dogs.
The whole
area of fighting dogs is a very lucrative one and it will now be driven
further underground and people will make even more money out of this cruelty
to animals.
In short the Council has been very irresponsible and rash in taking this
decision with very little thought for the consequences. The focus should be
on the behaviour of the owners and not the dogs and this issue can be
addressed with responsible ownership not destruction.
The breeds are: English Bull Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, American
Pit Bull Terrier, Rottweiler, German Shepherd (Alsatian), Doberman,
Rhodesian Ridgeback, Japanese Akita, Bull Mastiff, Japanese Tosa and Bandog.
Cross-breeds of these dogs or crosses of these dogs with any other breed are
also banned.
PLEASE FOLLOW LINK TO SIGN OUR PETITION TO
STOP
SUCH AN
IGNORANT AND IRRESPONSIBLE BAN......
►http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dublincitycouncildogban/index.html
******
Click here to check out Jan Fennell's First newsletter 'Listening
Today' ******